patching...
Update: Seen anything interesting around town? Post your photos in our Pics & Clips Gallery. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Bancroft and Turf Fields on Commissioners Agenda

Haddonfield borough commissioner meet in a work session.

 

The borough commissioner met Monday evening for a work session.

The work sessions are typically meetings to discuss public policy and actions but not necessarily vote on resolutions or ordinances. No votes are expected in tonight's meeting.

Agenda items included a scheduled discussion on the failed effort for a public purchase of the 19.2-acre Bancroft property. Voters rejected the purchase in a Jan. 22 bond referendum.

The commissioners also plan to have a discussion about how to pay for the installation of an artificial-turf field on a property adjacent to the high school football stadium near Kings Highway East. They approved a plan in May to spend $356,000 as part of a just over $1 million project to install turf on their field and the football stadium.

The borough school board will pay $135,000 toward the project. The public funds were contingent on the borough Let's Turf It committee raising at least $500,000 in private money for the project. They have raised more than $600,000, so far.

The turf field issue is intertwined with Bancroft because the borough planned to use its total of $600,000 it has collected for an open-space tax toward the public purchase of that property. Now that voters have rejected it, the open-space funds could be used for the turf-field project. The resolution approving the turf money stated it could be paid either with capital improvement funds, which often require bond money, or with money already collected from the open-space tax.

Please check back for details of the meeting on Wednesday.

Don't miss any Haddonfield or Haddon Township news. Sign up for Patch's free daily newsletter, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Related Topics: Bancroft public purchase, Haddonfield commissioners, and turf fields

Jeremiah Wright

7:30 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Open space = artificial turf. Right. Welcome to Bizzaro World.

Reply

J. Sheridan

7:54 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Using the open space tax money to pay for artificial turf fields would completely violate the public trust. People voted for this tax in the hopes that more "open space" land would be purchased for the town. Now that it's clear that there is no "open space" to be had here, it would add insult to injury to use that money for artifical turf. The cost of paying for artificial turf fields here has caused an incredible degree of anger and concern as to how our tax money is being used. If the elected officials did not get that message with the Bancroft vote, they will certainly hear it again if "open space" money is used to pay for artifical turf. Artifical turf is NOT a priority. The turf committee is welcome to continue to raise more money for it as well as raising long-term funds for continued maintenance.

Reply

Green acres

8:20 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

You crack me up with your garbage. Violate the public trust? Are you for real? Did you even read the referendum qustion that specifically said this is what it is for? Open space isnt just some dumb field for a bunch of tree kissers to hang out with. It means a lot of things. Read up pal. The law is clear. Turf fields are A OK!

The turf committee wants its open space and recreation taxes to fix our fields.

http://www.state.nj.us/governor/news/news/552011/approved/20110803.html

Reply

Jack S

9:10 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Clearly use of open space funds for turf would be an abuse. The fields are already under board/borough ownership. Using open space funds to turf the fields would do nada to enhance open space.

Reply

Roland W

9:24 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Hey green acres, That open space money is funded by Haddonfield taxpayer dollars. That means my hard earned coin went into it. You want a turf field because you think green acres junior is gonna be a star pay for it out of your own pocket. It's a practice field. A practice field. Now we gotta blow coin because green acres wants junior to practice on a turf field.
Tree kissers irritate me but you turf zombies really get my blood boiling.

Reply

Green acres

9:36 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Someone call a wah wah wambulance. Its what we all voted on. Are your taxes somehow more special than mine? What part of Development of land in the law did you fail to understand? Btw. It passed. You lost. Dont like it you can move to evesham. No wait they keep building turf fields with open space taxes.

Jack s clearly you dont have a clue. Open space doesnt literally mean just open space. Read the law before participating with those who did.

http://www.haddonfieldnj.org/news/?p=462

Reply

Roland W

10:04 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Remember that vote a week ago? The one where that last turf field was given the heave hoe? The same thing happens to the commissioners if those guys are stupid enough to turf a practice field. When it gets bounced and your done crying I'll send an old lady over to burp you.

Reply

frank rizzo

10:36 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Roland. The open space referendum passed 2 to 1 in 2011. The use of the fund for turf fields is legal.

Reply

Adam R

10:45 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Maybe legal, but I don't see turf mentioned in these links.

Reply

Roland W

10:52 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Where did I say it wasn't legal? I said it was stupid. And it is. Trying to blow all that money on a practice field.

Reply

frank rizzo

10:58 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Stupid? Using a dedicated tax for its exact use is stupid? I guess millions of us across the state and governor christie are stupid then. Oh well

Reply

Joe T

11:18 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Wasn't the Super Bowl exciting yesterday? Did anyone notice the playing surface was artificial turf.

Roland, "blow all that money" Huh? A few hundred K is "all that money" ? Don't the crazy soundbites ever get old?

Adam, just a few examples.

"Some enhanced facilities of the park include a synthetic turf football field, baseball and multi-use athletic fields and observation decks overlooking the Rahway River."

http://www.nj.gov/dep/newsrel/2012/12_0106.htm

The township plans to use money from its Open Space, Recreation, Farmland and Historic Preservation Trust Fund to pay for the project.

http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/burlington_county_times_news/multimillion-dollar-ballfields-project-to-be-built-in-evesham/article_fe6df718-8346-5335-899d-4ee13263c690.html

http://www.franklintwpnj.org/legal_ads/2012/120508-Legal%20Ads.pdf

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack S

1:15 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

So, Joe Flacco, who trained on grass (and not artificial turf), was underprivileged?

Joe Harrington

11:49 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

These Demo-Rats, led by one of your ex-mayors, NEVER accept "NO" as a response to what they want! The taxpayer be damned, they'll do what they please and enrich their friends and themselves along the way. Either throw 'em out and put 'em in jail, or pay the price!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chip Kelly

4:34 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Ladies and Gentlemen, Joe Harrington is right.

frank rizzo

8:28 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Mr Harrington do you always generalize this way? Many people want this so why do you so ignorantly attack those who want something? I'm sure you want something that others don't. Do they attack you? Time to put on your big boy pants and grow up.

Reply

Jack S

1:18 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

"Many people want this"? Precisely how many? And is it a majority of residents? In the Clarke Caton study of the Bancroft property done several years ago, only 9% of those surveyed wanted artificial turf on the site. While those who want artificial turf may be very vocal, there's no evidence that anything close to a majority of residents want their money to go towards turf. The commissioners who intend to stand for reelection this year need to bear that in mind.

Reply

Maryann Campling

4:59 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

I knew "the" Frank Rizzo......and I assure you, he would agreed with Mr. Harrington!

Reply

Leave a comment