Obama Moves to Address High Gas Prices
President Barack Obama is pressing Congress to tighten regulations governing oil speculators.
President Barack Obama wants Congress to give oil-market regulators more power to keep speculators from manipulating oil prices, which can lead to higher costs at the pump, the Huffington Post reports.
Obama is asking legislators to strengthen federal supervision of oil markets, increase penalties for market manipulation and empower regulators to increase the amount of money energy traders are required to put behind their transactions, the Huffington Post reports.
"We can't afford a situation where some speculators can reap millions while millions of American families get the short end of the stick," Obama said Tuesday at the White House.
AAA Mid-Atlantic says the average price of a gallon of regular gasoline in New Jersey on Friday was $3.79, which was unchanged from last week, according to the Courier-Post.
But that’s still nearly 5 percent higher than the average price a year ago, when motorists paid $3.61 per gallon.
Meanwhile, the national average price last week fell by 4 cents to $3.90 per gallon, the newspaper reports.
That’s a 2.3 percent increase over the national average from a year ago, which was $3.81.
Before stabilizing last week, gas prices had risen for 18 straight weeks in New Jersey, according to AAA.
Gerry Sylvester
7:47 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Dang.....I just wish the headline read..... "OBAMA MOVES"...... i guess i will have to wait for next January :)
libsrsic
8:12 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
"President Barack Obama wants Congress to give oil-market regulators more power to keep speculators from manipulating oil prices". This is such a sham. If Obama would allow the Keystone XL Pipeline to open, the "oil speculators" would work in the public's favor. All this bull crap showing the President "looking all serious" on the phone in the oval office...when he and his Energy Secretary said higher gas prices is a good thing. Really, Mr. Zatzariny, give your readers some credit of having some intellingence. Huffington Post...LOL, Courier Post...LOLOL.
SpeakUPNJ
8:46 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Wow...four years of rhetoric against the oil companies, the weather, Bush and "just bad luck"...and THIS is the best Energy Policy to help Americans at the pump that this "genius" Obama and his Marxist Socialist Democrats can conjure up! Talk about the clowns taking over the circus. These are the most inept and most MARXIST government control freaks America has ever let take over our great country. Obama and the Democrats have been using government power to RAISE gas prices not lower them....and this silly action reported here ...if it does anything will only further raise prices again. If the "genius" Marxist Socialist Obama and his Democrats were serious over the LAST FOUR YEARS they would have APPROVED the Keystone Pipeline from Canada, APPROVED new off-shore drilling leases, APPROVED opening more Government owned properties to drilling on-shore, REDUCED EPA regulations on oil refineries and truck diesel fuels, and created an atmosphere that overall ENCOURAGED coal, shale oil, natural gas etc for energy production INSIDE AMERICA. But they DID NOT. Instead they did exactly the opposite! Now its election time and they want you silly Liberal voters to buy into their "new energy policy" to lower gas prices....LOLOLOL. They are a bad joke, but an even worse joke are those that still BLINDLY BELIEVE these Liberal Socialist Democrats want gas prices to go down! Wake-up America. We let the Marxist into the oval office...and he wants to control OUR LIVES!
Bill Duhart
9:03 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Wow...these questions about Obama seem to bring out the worst in some people... Wonder what's up with that???
Gerry Sylvester
9:47 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
@Bill Duhart....gee I thought these questions bring out the educated people,... the ones who actually know what is going on and don't have their head stuck in the sand.
John Hayden
10:27 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
So according to Bill, pointing out facts is the worst in people. Passive-aggressive commenting by a "journalist" is very unbecoming, especially given what's being insinuated.
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."
-Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Between SpeakUPNJ and Mr. Duhart, who do you think is more appropriately fulfilling Dr. King's dream?
Bill Duhart
10:47 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
John Hayden invoked Martin Luther King to critique my comment... Hmm... How often did King accuse the president of the United States of being a "Marxist Socialist?" Or refer to the president as a "clowns taking over the circus?" Thanks for reading John and SpeakUPNJ (whomever you are). I think a "journalist" or any other citizen has a right to participate in public dialogue and I think civility is needed in all of these discussions.
Paul J. DiBartolo
12:19 pm on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Bill, do we really need to talk about civility when criticisms are raised against a man who has sought to turn Americans against each other more than any other president, the same man who said that all we know how to do is cling to our guns and our religion?
This was a man who said he would bring Americans together. This was a man who said he would rid Congress of the bipartisan way business was carried on there...
Ah, never mind, but seriously, Bill, give us a break.
John Hayden
1:19 pm on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Bill,
I'm not criticizing your participation in the discussion as a journalist. I'm criticizing the way you brought race into it, in a very passive-aggressive way. Clearly you support President Obama because of the color of his skin and ignore the content of his character, which puts you directly at odds with Dr. King.
Injecting accusations of racism is a tactic employed by those who cannot argue the facts based on their merits. Can you refute any of SpeakUPNJ's claims with facts, or is implied racism the best response you can muster?
Ric
1:38 pm on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Paul B, I really do not like Obama but I do believe in honesty. The republicans are the ones who are driving a wedge in America. Read the news with an open mind.
By the way, I am a moderate republican - the ones the conservatives are pushing out of the party and into independents.
The poor conservative republicans are having so much trouble understanding evolution that nothing else makes sense to them.
Bill Duhart
2:33 pm on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Who said anything about race John?? My picture is on my comments because I stand by the integrity of this site and my comments. I think it's incredibly ignorant to assume I support Obama because of my race. Obama clearly draws strong reactions in you and only you can determine why that is. Now, let's talk about facts... You think it's a fact that Obama is a Marxist and a Socialist?? Now apply that same test of bias to your comments and see what you come up with...
Robb C. Sewell-Wolff
5:37 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Paul,
Please clarify. In what specific ways has Obama "sought to turn Americans against each other more than any other president"?
Paul J. DiBartolo
12:01 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
OK, Ric, I'm game. Let's be honest, however, so it will actually require facts and let's keep it simple to start. So, give one solid example of "The republicans are the ones who are driving a wedge in America" with documenting evidence, please.
And, BTW, "The poor conservative republicans are having so much trouble understanding evolution that nothing else makes sense to them," none of that stuff either because anybody can stand on the sidelines and lob water balloons from the cover of a crowd. I can say that kind of stuff all day long but prefer to have evidence so what I say is believable. Own you statements with documented facts.
John Hayden
12:55 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
I know he is a Marxist Socialist. One needs to look no further than the healthcare law to see that.
Did they teach you to use two or three question marks in journalism school, or is that your own little passive-aggressive touch on your writing style?
Ed B
8:54 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Wonder who fell into the category of driving as much as before prices went up???
Probably NJ state employees that are taking state vehicles home on our dime!
Their is no way they need that perk. No way in Hell is there a state Gov. agency office open at 6:00 AM & still open @ 7:00 PM when I see these cars on my commute in my company van.
Judy Juzaitis
9:43 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Isn't Obama speculating with our tax dollars on "green energy"?! He has blown probaby billions of our tax dollars on failed companies. Where are the "cops on the street" he's now talking about, looking into what he's done, blowing away our money speculating on wind and solar. Judy Juzaitis
Richard Magee
11:43 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
And they All were his big Donors! He used OUR Tax Dollars to 'Reward them". Quid pro quo. They fail and loose nothing of their own. Obama is the Poster Child for the Pro-Abortion Movement. It is just a shame his mother didn't subscribe. ~Rick Magee, FL
libsrsic
11:08 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Mr. Duhart,
You are deflecting the real issue of the President's ineptitude and radical policies about his and his Energy Secretary's cause and promotion of higher energy prices, by trying to insert a trumped up issue of lack of "civility". The previous writer merely was pointing out that the energy policies are that which is characteristic of Marxist Socialism. Typical progressivism: "Don't look here at the real issue, LOOK, WHAT'S THIS? INCIVILITY, RACISM, WAR ON WOMEN".
libsrsic
11:11 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Mr. Duhart,
Your comment about our opinions bringing out "the worst in some people" are testimony to the sorry state of journalism these days. Truly pathetic.
libsrsic
5:37 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Ric, you're the one who sounds like a "wedge driver" if you ask me. Moderate Republican=still stuck in the evolutionary process of having one's head stuck in one's oriface. November 2010, remember?
libsrsic
11:36 am on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Ric,
November 2010.
Schu
5:38 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
If we just listen to the President and inflate our tires and get tune up on our vehicles then gas prices won't be so bad.
SpeakUPNJ
5:38 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
There is nothing about race in my comments. Only a Liberal Socialist sees race in every Conservative argument about Obama. And they really only claim to see race because they cannot face up to the fact that Obama is the poorest performing President in modern American history. Why is putting a name to exactly what Obama's instituted policies and overt executive actions represent in America so darn "uncivil" to the Liberal Socialists out there that worship him and brought him to power? Look he is your leader. Rejoice in his ideology. You follow his every ideological inflection with bated breath. He is a Marxist Socialist. That is not a curse word, is it? I am sorry it offends YOU. But frankly it really does offend me that YOU put him in charge of America and yet you cannot face up to and openly embrace the ideology he brought with him to inflict on this country. You can't have it both ways, stop hiding behind claimed "incivility" of words and "race hate" as an issue to deflect the truth for an abysmally failing President.
Jack S
12:48 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Why in the past few weeks has Patch become a mouthpiece for the Obama Administration? Not enough local/regional news that's fit to print?
Joe Friday
2:32 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Patch owned by AOL, which also owns Huffington Post. Just the facts, ma'am
Dan Reynolds
1:59 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
http://www.eia.gov/finance/markets/ Is why gas prices are high. Obama has nothing to do with it. The idea of "domestic fuel supply" is a joke. Oil companies will simply sell what they can get to the highest bidder. (China/India)
libsrsic
3:55 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Dan,
All the President would have to do is "mention" that he would open up drilling and the prices would fall. Yes, let's take a look at the stats at the eia.gov site:
$4.00/gal July 21, 2008 to $1.63/gal Dec 29, 2008.... http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/xls/pswrgvwall.xls
... and gasoline prices did NOT start up until Obama abruptly by executive order CANCELED the Republican Administrations plans to drill in FEBRUARY 11, 2009...as soon as he took office he dropped BUSH's announced plan and the gas took off never to return...
Jan 26, 2009 $ 1.83/gal to $2.73/gal Jan 25, 2010 to $3.11/gal Jan 2011 to $ 3.52/gal Jan 30, 2012. http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/xls/pswrgvwall.xls...
Richard Magee
11:44 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
Obam is the Poster Child for the Pro Aborttionists! ~Rick Magee, FL
Richard Magee
11:45 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
Paul DiBartolo: You sent a reply to me. What in my post do you disagree with? My comments are accurate as to the Donors and the FAILED "Energy" Companies to which Obummer gave Our Tax Dollars. Moderates are RINO's. ~Rick Magee, FL
fire stopper
5:39 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Wow, How sad that race has to be brought into EVERY conversation in a HP story. And when it's not brought in to it by a reader/poster, It's brought into the mix by one of it's journalist. Yes Bill, We did understand you completely and yes you did make a racist comment. And believe it or not, Just because you didn't say it out right doesn't mean we all don't know what you are trying to say. As far as Obama goes, In my book. I just think he's a poor POTUS and we need a change.
Tim Zatzariny Jr.
2:51 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Jack, it was I who posted the story/poll about President Obama's actions regarding oil-market regulations. My reasoning was that high gas prices affect everyone, and that this was a story of great interest locally. My decision had nothing to do with being a "mouthpiece" for the Obama Administration, or anyone else.
libsrsic
5:40 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Tim,
Maybe you want to look into what President Obama meant when he said that under his energy plan, "electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket".
Or when he and his energy secretary said they would like to see gas rates the same or more than Europe (which I believe at the time were $5.00 per gallon.
I am not saying anything negative about the President, only what he is on record of saying, resulting in policies which are obviously driving up gas prices.
Jack S
10:04 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Tim,
Thanks for responding. Yes, gas prices do have a local impact. But why present only the Obama Administration's latest spin on the issue. In this campaign season, where is Governor Romney's take on this issue? Were you aware that Governor Romney was less than 7 miles away from Haddonfield just this past Monday night (i.e., at the Franklin Institute) and touched on the issue of energy? And that many Haddonfield residents were in attendance? How's that for local? I continue to believe the article is one-sided and a poor selection for a town like Haddonfield, which remains predominantly right of center. If Patch wants to drive many local readers away, it will continue to run Obama-focused stories on a regular basis. This would be unfortunate because Patch does an otherwise fine job with its Haddonfield stories, and Patch's editor and many of its writers seem to be objective, comprehensive, and timely in their reporting on the town. The run of Obama articles stands out like a sore thumb because the nexus to local issues is remote.
Matt Skoufalos
3:23 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Hey, a lot of fun words are being tossed around here. Let's see if we can agree on some definitions of terms. Since we're speaking in economic terms, do these work for everyone?
Marxism: http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Marxism.html
Socialism: http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Socialism.html
Let's see if we can lose the ad hominem attacks and discuss the issues at hand. Anger and emotions are only going to cloud any chance of this being a productive discussion. Come back to me after you've read.
Matt Skoufalos
3:25 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
More to the point are these paragraphs:
"Marx claimed that his criticism of capitalism was based on the latest developments in science. He called his theory “scientific socialism” to clearly distinguish his approach from that of other socialists...who seemed more content to dream about some future ideal society without comprehending how existing society really worked."
"Specifically, Marx claimed that capitalism has ruptured into a war between two classes...the capitalist class that owns the means of production...[and] the working class, which is at [their] mercy..."
"Marx predicted that competition among capitalists would grow so fierce that, eventually, most capitalists would go bankrupt, leaving only a handful of monopolists controlling nearly all production...Competition, instead of creating better products at lower prices for consumers, in the long run creates monopoly, which exploits workers and consumers alike..."
"Also, thought Marx, the anarchic, unplanned nature of a complex market economy is prone to economic crises as supplies and demands become mismatched, causing huge swings in business activity and, ultimately, severe economic depressions."
Can anyone tell me that they don't see this kind of thing happening in corporate America today?
libsrsic
3:59 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
No, Matt, I don't "see" this today. I see financial collapse of Greece because of out of control GOVERNMENT spending. I also saw the collapse of Spain's economy because of that country's revamping of the entire economy to fund "green" technology. Marxism and Socialism never worked, is not working now and will never work.
Matt Skoufalos
4:05 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
No one is advocating for Marxism; Marxism is not a form of policy, it is a form of social/historical analysis. This story talks about measures to prevent the kind of speculation that sunk the housing market and jacked up gas prices--and that is one of the root causes, speculation on toxic assets.
Matt Skoufalos
4:14 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
If you look at the link Dan sent above, you could find this graphic on the root causes of energy prices, of which there are several:
http://www.eia.gov/finance/markets/images/factors.png
This page, which talks about spot pricing, illustrates the drivers that lead to crude trading, which affects gasoline prices most directly:
http://www.eia.gov/finance/markets/spot_prices.cfm
"It takes years to develop new supply sources or vary production, and it is very hard for consumers to switch to other fuels or increase fuel efficiency in the near term when prices rise. Under such conditions, a large price change can be necessary to re-balance physical supply and demand following a shock to the system."
There's no magic faucet to turn on or off, especially as a lot of the world's energy supply is located in politically volatile places, like the Middle East, Soviet satellite states, and North Africa.
libsrsic
4:01 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
BTW Dan,
$4.00/gal July 21, 2008 to $1.63/gal Dec 29, 2008.... This was a direct result of President Bush lifting the Drilling moratoria.
Diogenes
4:20 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
There is a distinction between coincidence of events and causality. Please prove that lifting a drilling moratorium produces immediate lower prices, considering that it takes many years to bring a newly drilled field on line to production.
libsrsic
4:14 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
http://www.arthurhu.com/index/genocide.htm:
"Dedicated to the hope that people will one day stop using the name of economic justice to kill their fellow man and woman, and finally realize that Karl Marx, not free market capitalism, is the most evil system of thought, and biggest source of death and poverty in human history." And, "And the award for the most mass killings credited to one man goes to ... (ta dah...) Karl Marx! Congratulations! It exceeds all war deaths in the 20th century, and even the wildest inflation of deaths due to slavery."
Diogenes
4:22 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Are you perhaps confusing Marx with Lenin?
libsrsic
4:22 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Matt,
Marxism certainly is effecting bad policies and it certainly did set Marx's policies.
The housing market woes is a great example of the GOVERNMENT forcing banks to make bad loans.
Matt Skoufalos
4:45 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Two clarifications:
1. Marx never held a political office, so no, he was not a policymaker in the same sense that President Obama is, and that is how I am using the word.
2. Even if you want to talk about the Fannie/Freddie cosign thing, it was the private banks that balled up the toxic assets and sold them on the open market--especially in Europe, and especially in Greece:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/16/us-socgen-results-idUSTRE81F0DK20120216
If you want to read about government handling of banking regulations, do a little research on how mortgages are held in countries like Spain where there is no way to escape your debt obligations through bankruptcy. You have your facts confused with your rhetoric.
Sorry for dipping into this conversation a little deeper than I intended. I wanted to just offer some definitions of terms so that we can all have a productive consideration of facts. I'm glad that we have so many engaged commenters on Patch, and I appreciate the opportunity to chat with you all!
Diogenes
4:36 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Look at our current predicament and think about this: "...the development of capitalism has arrived at a state when...it has in reality been undermined and the big profits go to the 'genius' of financial manipulation." --V. Lenin
David Vaccaro
5:30 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Bill Duhar
2:33 pm on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Who said anything about race John?? My picture is on my comments because I stand by the integrity of this site and my comments. I think it's incredibly ignorant to assume I support Obama because of my race. Obama clearly draws strong reactions in you and only you can determine why that is. Now, let's talk about facts... You think it's a fact that Obama is a Marxist and a Socialist?
Bill,
I'd say it's a pretty good bet by what you say here linked with your picture that you strongly support Obama. Black support for him makes any reasonable person suspect that some type of racism is at work. Personally I think most Blacks, having been historically handed the dirty end of the stick(of which I somewhat agree) are unable to process Barak Obama. When a specific group so soundly backs the aberrant and un-American actions of a person of similar background, what are people to think? Blacks voting in lock-step to the tune of mid 90%? I have voted for and against people with whom I shared a common background but could never do so based on that. I think the fact that Obama was even elected in the first place shows that someone's color means far less than their ideology...unless of course you are Black. Then excuses are made and even people, such as yourself, with a clear "bias" such as yours, do nothing to quell such fears. Valid observations are just that regardless of color.
Jack S
9:39 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Patch seems to miss the point that Haddonfield is predominantly a right-of-center town. While the number of Republican voters in town is no longer at the 75%+ level it was just 15 or 20 years ago, it remains well above 50% today. Obama got a good proportion of the local votes in 2008, but was clearly a one-time event which will not be repeated in 2012 given what Haddonfield voters now know about his policies. If Patch wants to retain its relatively modest readership in Haddonfield, it must strive to be more objective (e.g., it seems to run only or predominantly Obama articles), or we'll all go back to reading the Sun. Know thy readers, Patch.
David Vaccaro
10:08 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Jack S,
Very interesting to know. I stumbled on this site and was a bit confused by the adulation for our odd president. Being from Northern New Jersey I saw a similar thing happen here back before Clinton with our newspapers. Young people, largely young women had taken over the editorial departments of what had always been traditionally local and fairly apolitical newspapers. Advertisers eventually started pulling their ads until some sanity returned. This site seems to be fertile ground for Obama and company to push his "hope and change" voodoo. I'm guessing Mr. Duham to be in his early forties and lacking the experience that usually develops over time.
Tim Zatzariny Jr.
10:23 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Jack, please let us know what stories you'd like to see on Haddonfield Patch. We accept news tips/story ideas 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. My cell number is 609-775-5880, email is tim.zatz@patch.com. I look forward to hearing from you.
Jack S
10:25 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
It may make sense for a paper like the Philly Inquirer -- which is based in a predominantly Democrat city -- to run articles that present just President Obama's spin on an issue. Though that has not necessarily helped the Inquirer's circulation or ad sales in recent years. It makes no sense for a local paper like the Patch to run such articles, in a predominantly right of center town such as Haddonfield. In fact, one of the things that is really nice about Patch is that a lot of its articles are apolitical in nature, allowing one to escape from the campaign infighting. If Patch feels compelled to run political stories, my hope is that it would at least present both sides of the issues, and include truly local commentary. It has run some of those in the past (e.g., man on the street interviews), but the article above (and some other recent articles) are not among them.
libsrsic
10:39 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Mr. Zatzariny,
I would like to submit a story idea, namely, the price of gas and how the price plummeted when President Bush lifted the drilling moratoria. Be sure to include what happened to prices when Obama reversed Bush's plan.
libsrsic
10:48 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Matt,
I beg your pardon, but your two clarifications don't get to the genesis of the problem---socialist big government. Call it whatever you want, but the President's policy decisions are ruining this Country. He has run up our debt and deficit more than all of our past Presidents combined.
David Vaccaro
10:49 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Mr. Zatzariny,
I would like to submit a story idea, namely, the price of gas and how the price plummeted when President Bush lifted the drilling moratoria. Be sure to include what happened to prices when Obama reversed Bush's plan.
Slim chance of that. But they will advertise the successes of Obama's new "Fart Car". He says he's going to buy one when he gets back to Chicago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSBP1JJKeeY
libsrsic
11:05 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Awww, what a quaint vehicle. That will make the environmentalists all giddy. Chris Matthews will get another thrill running up his leg. Will Mr. Obama be transporting his new car in his limo or private jet?
libsrsic
10:56 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
David and Jack,
The Patch is owed, as mentioned above, by the Huffington Post which has been financed by George Soros, the uber left billionaire, who reportedly dabbles in the destruction of nations' economies. The Patch staff never criticized contributors as vociferously as they've been doing on this thread. They must have been given their marching orders from Arianna Huffington to quell dissent of Obama as the election approaches.
Jennifer S
10:59 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Why is Socialism a bad word? "A socialist economic system would consist of an organisation of production to directly satisfy economic demands and human needs, so that goods and services would be produced directly for use instead of for private profit driven by the accumulation of capital, and accounting would be based on physical quantities, a common physical magnitude, or a direct measure of labour-time.[5][6] Distribution of output would be based on the principle of individual contribution."
That sounds great. In Canada (and most other countries) people don't become homeless because of medical bills. It is a wonderful thing to at least know that you will still have a place to live after having a serious medical condition attended to. I have a real problem with people who claim to be proud of this country but disagree with everything Obama does just because he is a Democrat. Most people just seem to be throwing words around without even knowing what they mean. Do a little investigating on your own. DON'T go to the news source you regularly go to...try others and come to an enlightened conclusion on your own. Spouting out buzzwords and using catch phrases don't prove that you are informed. It makes you a tape recorder stuck on "playback."
libsrsic
11:19 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Did any one say they didn't like President Obama because he's a democrat? Jennifer if you lived in Canada and, God forbid, have a serious medication condition for which you are put on a long waiting list, the first thing you'll do is get a ticket to the U.S.A. and book a room at one of our world's finest hospitals. (that is unless socialized medicine ruins it). I guess you're too young to realize that people have been coming to this Country for treatment because their government run health care in their respective Countries can't give them the immediate life saving care they need.
Jennifer S
11:54 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
libsric-I did live in Canada for 35 years. Waiting for a long time for treatment for something life threatening is a bit of an exaggeration. The reason there is a wait at all is because everyone gets treated. Period. No matter what. It is only extremely wealthy people that have the means necessary to travel to other countries that come to the US for treatment. And in that case to a specialty privately owned business. Not a public one. Here, people go around blind and without limbs because they can't afford a regular visit with their doctor where things like Diabetes can be detected. This is a horrible shame. I don't like to see anyone living with an illness because they can't afford insurance.
David Vaccaro
11:17 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
libsrsic
David and Jack,
The Patch is owed, as mentioned above, by the Huffington Post which has been financed by George Soros, the uber left billionaire, who reportedly dabbles in the destruction of nations' economies. The Patch staff never criticized contributors as vociferously as they've been doing on this thread. They must have been given their marching orders from Arianna Huffington to quell dissent of Obama as the election approaches.
It seems you are correct. I knew the Obama man-love going on here was very strange. This is something the people of this local area should know.
Thanks
Matt Skoufalos
12:03 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
David, I know I've only been on the job for less than a week, but unless you're privy to some memos that I'm not getting, the only coverage dictate we have here at Patch is to serve the communities in which we are located with timely, accurate, and locally focused reporting.
I can guarantee you that we welcome conversation of all kinds on these message boards--in fact, that's what we're seeing here. It's not necessary for you to slam the site for hosting a forum in which you can meet other folks to share your ideas.
In truth, if anyone were stifling your opinions, they wouldn't be here at all to be read. So let's try to keep a little perspective, please.
Bob G-man
12:12 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
90% of the Canadian population lives within 100 miles of the U.S. border. It doesn't take a whole lot of "means' to get here.