patching...
Update: Seen anything interesting around town? Post your photos in our Pics & Clips Gallery. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Pope's Philly Trip to Endorse Straight Marriage

Pope Benedict XVI will travel to Philadelphia in 2015 for a World Meeting of Families summit as the Roman Catholic Church makes a clear statement about gay marriage.

 

In a clear statement in support of traditional "one man-one woman" marriage in the United States, the Vatican has put Philadelphia at ground zero of the debate over gay marriage.

The Catholic Archdiocese of Philadelphia, which includes Roman Catholic Churches in Philadelphia and the surrounding suburbs, has announced it will host the Vatican's 2015 World Meeting of Families. Pope Benedict XVI is likely to appear. 

The selection of Philadelphia came as Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput  attended this year's World Meeting in Milan, Italy, over the weekend. The meeting is held once every three years.

In making the announcement, the Archbishop also made his position on gay marriage clear, saying in a news release:

"The family is founded on a deep and loving union between one man and one woman for mutual support and the nurturing of children. This meeting in Philadelphia will be a wonderful opportunity to highlight the family as the basic evangelizing unit of the church. Every effort to promote marriage and the family serves not only the church, but also the common good."

Politics, same-sex marriage and the media

The announcement comes just weeks after President Obama officially changed his position and came out in support of same-sex marriage. The World Meeting of Families is usually attended by the pope, assuring major domestic and international media attention for the Vatican's position on marriage and families.

Archbishop Chaput acknowledged as much in a statement released on Sunday, saying:

"It's fitting that this gathering, which celebrates the cornerstone of society, will take place in America's cradle of freedom. The Holy Father's choice is a gift to the local  church in Philadelphia and to the whole nation."
 

What do you think of the announcement and the Archdiocese's position on marriage and the family? Is Philadelphia a fitting place to stage the debate?

Tell us in the comments section at the bottom of this article.

 

Related Topics: Catholic Archdiocese of Philadelphia, Pope Benedict XVI, Vatican, World Meeting of Families Philadelphia, and same-sex marriage

George L. Hohenleitner

3:18 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

In 1910 G. K.. Chesterton, perhaps the greatest writer of the 20th century, wrote "What's Wrong With the World", to highlight that what is wrong is that we do not ask what is right. Pope Benedict XVI's visit to Philadelphia in 2015 for the World Meeting of Families will remind us all of what is right at the core of our society: Families as God intended them to be.

Comment_arrow

Cinnacide

4:21 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

So does God intend for priests to molest children as well?

Ric

4:22 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

I just talked to God. He is doing fine and sends his regards to you and everyone! He also told me to pass it on that you got it wrong. God is the God of love and not the God of hate.
He is perfectly fine with gay marriage. He admitted that he is not pleased about the Catholic Church in Philadelphia. Says there is more to come out.

In closing, God reminds us that he is all about love. And that is God's truth!

Comment_arrow

David Vaccaro

10:36 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Ric,

Once again on your favorite subject...gay marriage. Why don't you just come out of the closet rather than just imply that you have no personal interest in the subject?

Comment_arrow

Ric

9:13 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

David Vaccaro, why is it that the loudest critics of gay rights, like yourself, always turn out to be major closet cases, gays in denial. Betcha your closest is decorated quite nicely.

Cinna Guy

6:29 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Long live the Pope! It's great that people still have morals and believe how they were raised. Funny how in this country is that it's almost a crime to be anti-gay marriage. I hope this Papal visit reverses this trend and brings ignorance out of people.

Chatty Tom

9:46 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

This is great news! How do we get advanced tickets? This would be like getting olympics tickets. Good to see our city being a spotlight of something good for a change

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Lauren Burgoon

12:08 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

I'll wager there won't be any info on this until much, much closer to the event, but when the pope came to D.C., the area archdioceses were allotted tickets for a mass at Nationals Park and each gave them out according to their own system -- a lottery among church members in most cases. The area Catholic universities also received tickets.

David Vaccaro

10:05 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Bob Byrne,

Interesting, the title you came up with on this article, "Pope's Philly Trip to Endorse Straight Marriage". I know you are one of the Patch leftists but don't you think that "Pope's Philly Trip to Endorse Traditional Marriage" would better define his visit? You intentionally used that title to imply something negative. Marriage has always been about one man and one women. This new perversion is the product of people like you, so anxious to be inclusive and understanding at the cost of the society at large. Thousands of years of tradition and a few little leftist lunatics come on board to show everyone the way. I think Patch hires people for their editorial staff from the roles of mental institutions....in Cuba.

Comment_arrow

Our Town

10:16 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

...and what exactly is that cost to society at large? I sure hope it's not too steep so we can all pray it away for an hour on Sunday mornings so we don't have to pay any attention to it the other 167 hours in the week.

Comment_arrow

Cinnacide

3:46 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

I'm starting to learn there is a lot of scared old people in this site who flaunt their ignorance and favor a strong right-wing outlook. There is no factual basis on which you are arguing. You just used your own bias to warp the meaning of the title of this article and then went on an offensive rant. Also, if you want to rectify the thousands of years of tradition, does this mean that making women property is right as well?

Comment_arrow

Cinna Guy

6:28 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

David, I agree with you. Soon enough, people will start thinking that it's ok to marry their dogs. Ridiculous how messed up liberalism can be.

Comment_arrow

Ric

9:17 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Cinna guy, it is strange how no one else brought that up. Since you brought it up, obviously the thought of marrying dogs occurred to you

Scrappy

11:41 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

David "Patch" is a liberal media. Owned by AOL. What else do you expect? It seems they drive anything moral or just off the cliff and yes try to be "politically correct" with this and other subjects.
David is right and factual that marriage is between one woman and one man.

Comment_arrow

MacArthur

12:02 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Except, you know, all those other times in the Bible when it wasn't, when it was between a man and six wives, or a man, a wife, some concubines or slaves, or in modern times, when Republican bigwigs get divorced and remarried seven times.

Then it's anything goes. Right? Right.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Matt Skoufalos

12:12 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

You know, sometimes a shorter word just fits the headline better. "Heterosexual" and "Straight" mean the same thing; one just makes the link easier to read in our column width. I would love to see where you think Patch has done anything amoral in its coverage.

Shirley

3:38 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Does anyone remember the Papal flowers debacle from the 1979 visit? I'm fuzzy on the details but I remember that tulips were planted especially for the visit. Chaos ensued when the bulbs were dug up. Does anyone have more details?

David Vaccaro

7:16 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Our Clown,

How is it a cost to our society at large? How about the celebration of the abnormal? I think most of the gay persuasion know they are not normal. And most of them know the purpose of setting some kind of standard for a society. I don't advocate doing anything that infringes on one's personal liberty but society has a right to set some standards and in 32 states to date the public doesn't want "gay marriage(an oxymoron) to be the ideal. It's not about hatred, it's about standards and ideals.

And your disgust for the religious gives away your personal abnormal views. Why don't you try to live and let live rather than bend the rules to support your own perversion?

David Vaccaro

7:22 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Take Cyanide,

There is no comparison between women's rights and gay rights. Being abnormal has nothing to do with an individuals rights. To get a drivers license has requirements...age, capability, etc. Society has the right to set standards for marriage. In the US they say one man, one woman. In Kenya it may be different but that's their right.

David Vaccaro

7:25 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

McArthur,

The basis isn't necessarily religious, except for fools like you trying to muddy the water. Democrat bigwigs do too. What's that have to do with the price of milk?

David Vaccaro

7:29 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Matt Skoufalos,

Anyone with half a brain(so I qualify) knows what your leftist in arms was trying to do. Straight, gay...what's the difference? It was a purposeful use of words. And why isn't Bobby answering himself? And why do you feel compelled to answer for him? You are answering because you know I'm correct. ANd Bobby is not answering because he knows he's wrong.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Bryan Littel

10:39 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Bob's not answering because he's one of our PA editors (Trediffryn-Easttown, specifically) and doesn't get notifications on comments posted when we pick up his stories on this side of the Delaware. It's less of a conspiracy than you may think, Dave.

David Vaccaro

9:21 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Ric,

I don't know what the basis of your belief is but if it makes you feel gay, so be it.

Ric

9:42 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

David Vaccaro, you are dominating this discussion. 1 out of 3 messages were written by you. Clearly you are a safe hating homosexual..

Just a couple more messages by you and it will be 1 out of 2 messages are written by you!

Comment_arrow

David Vaccaro

9:50 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Ric,

What's a "safe hating" homosexual. Maybe if you were clearer with your postings I would not have to keep answering you asking for clarification.

David Vaccaro

10:11 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Matt Skoufalos,

On another subject...when is Patch(you being the head leftist) going to do another puff piece on President Obama what with Scott Walker crushing the recall effort in Wisconsin? I think this loss will have some profound impact on us here in New Jersey. I'm looking forward to your next piece telling us all how wonderful Obamacare is going to be for us all and how brilliant its author.

p.s I love Patch's article on Facebook...do you "Facebook"?

David Vaccaro

11:08 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Bryan Littel

10:39 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Bob's not answering because he's one of our PA editors (Trediffryn-Easttown, specifically) and doesn't get notifications on comments posted when we pick up his stories on this side of the Delaware. It's less of a conspiracy than you may think, Dave.

Brian,

I'll take you at your word but since you've taken the interest...why not weigh in on his wording?

Dave

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Bryan Littel

11:23 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Pretty self-explanatory. The controversy's over gay marriage (which, like it or not, now exists in at least some states), and the Pope's coming in to say man-woman marriage is the only option (big surprise, I know). Traditional, straight, heterosexual - semantically, it's all the same, and since gay marriage is an option, it's necessary to have some kind of qualifier. "Straight" fits more neatly.

Parse it to your heart's delight, though, Dave.

David Vaccaro

8:28 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Bryan Littel

11:23 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Pretty self-explanatory. The controversy's over gay marriage (which, like it or not, now exists in at least some states), and the Pope's coming in to say man-woman marriage is the only option (big surprise, I know). Traditional, straight, heterosexual - semantically, it's all the same, and since gay marriage is an option, it's necessary to have some kind of qualifier. "Straight" fits more neatly.

Bryan,

"self-explanatory"... to you...a young and partisan liberal. Anyone trying to represent themselves as delivering information in impartial way wouldn't use such a term. The Pope, any Pope is understood to be the spiritual leader of a religious movement wouldn't use the word "straight" and only a half-wit with an agenda would mix such a term in his title. If he went on to mention his personal view and used the term "straight" would have been fine but Bobby didn't. It is you that has to "parse to your heart's delight"<-that's very appropriate.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Bryan Littel

9:05 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

What term would you have used, Dave?

David Vaccaro

2:01 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Bryan,

Any normally educated person would have written the title of the article, "Pope's Philly Trip to Endorse Traditional Marriage". It wouldn't have betrayed the author as bias, snarky or ill-educated. It would have been perfectly acceptable to have used the term "straight" in the body of the article. What he wrote doesn't make sense unless you are writing for an outfit dedicated to pushing an extreme philosophy.

Comment_arrow

JustWondering

2:36 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Thank you, David, for being the articulate and well-reasoned voice of the all-too-silent, but overwhelming majority of our community. The attempts to twist and distort your logic by those who don't agree are sad commentary on societal trends and the ability of people to engage in reasonable and civil discourse. I do appreciate your sense of humor. (Of course, I am the proud owner of a signed, 1st edition "Book of Chris" so I guess that slants my thinking a bit!)

Keep on keepin' on!!!

Roland W

4:28 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Dave, I've been reading your posts for a while and noticed gays really disgust you. At first I thought this was religion but I'm thinking differently after you told someone to take cyanide for having a different opinion from you. I don't remember that one in the bible but I read an article where if people hate gays it's because they're really gay themselves. Come on Dave, it's a new age! You can come out of the closet!

David Vaccaro

7:41 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

JustWondering,

That is nice of you to say. I'm always encouraged when I meet people that are brave enough to endure the wave of insanity that gets aimed at those who don't accept the maniacal arguments offered by the easily led and weak-minded. There are plenty of people that still have no problem distinguishing truth from nonsense. The birth of the computer and instant communications have given lunatics the sense they are in control...fortunately they're not, but some have yet to realize it.

Dave

David Vaccaro

7:50 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Roland W,

I suggest you up the prescription on your reading glasses because you see things that don't exist. I've never said what you have implied. But speaking of "Gays"...it always amuses me when those who supposedly have sensitivities that us mere mortals lack, suggest that we are "closet" gays and that would be some kind of punishment. As though to be such would be a fate worse than death.

Roland...you are very odd.

Patch_comments_icon

Matt Skoufalos

9:44 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

I'm going to (once again) remind the commenters here about our terms of service. You can talk about whatever you want. You have the right to express your opinions. But there's nothing that says that you're allowed to namecall, harrass, threaten, or bully your fellow Patchers. Keep the ugliness at bay or you will not have the privilege of communicating here.

Roland W

9:47 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Queen Dave, Yep, I agree. That's me. The easily led. Actually, my viewpoint is the same as yours. I'm just not stupid enough to say it like you do. As far as calling me sensitive, I find that pretty insulting. If you're going to insult me, I wish you'd just tell me to take cyanide like you did to the other guy.
Good for you sticking up for the other closet gays like you. Your more sensitive than people give you credit for.

Comment_arrow

David Vaccaro

9:56 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Roland W,

"Queen" Dave? Why do you consider this an insult? Can't you see the weakness of your position? How does using homosexual slurs make you more accepting than me? You think implying I'm gay insults me. If that makes you feel you've harmed me in some way...then I'm gay. Now how does this make your position superior to mine? Roland...you're not only odd but very misguided.

Comment_arrow

Ric

6:34 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

LOL! David Vacarro owns this report on gay marriage. Most of the replies, 17 of the 44 (over 1/3) were made by Vaccaro. Poor fella is consumed with gay marriage because he is trying to suppress his urge to dance the rumba out of his closet.
I am guessing by the time David is done replying, he will have written 39 replies, which will be over half the replies made.
Well, he has no life other than spending his nights at Patch moaning about gay marriage. Come out of the closet, David,

Roland W

10:47 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Dave, Dave, Dave, I'm not trying to harm you buddy, I'm not trying to say my position is superior to yours. I'm saying my viewpoint is ignorant, intolerant and condescending and to think I'm morally superior and to insult others because their viewpoint is different makes me a jackass! Just like you! We're brothers in arms. As for telling me I'm odd and misguided, we sure are.

Comment_arrow

David Vaccaro

11:43 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Roland W.,

Hey, why don't you just speak for yourself like I do? When the sun is low in the sky I have my own shadow. You should try to establish your own identity rather than try to absorb mine.

You know who you should check out? Ric. He's your kind of "guy" or whatever.

Roland W

6:14 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

When the sun is low I have my own shadow? What kind of left wing liberal crappola is that? You sure are making it hard for me to absorb that jackass identity of yours. Oh well, all I can say is Long live the Queen! Hey, that was a stupid, ignorant thing for me to say. I'm back in Dave world and life is good.

Comment_arrow

David Vaccaro

6:24 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Ric,

I know it's you. :-)

Dave

p.s. I must really bother you...no?

David Vaccaro

6:39 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Ric/Roland,

You really surprise me...you can count. (-:

Dave

Roland W

11:00 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Dave, It's just like you're Sherlock Holmes, the way you figured out I'm Ric/Roland. I guess you used your keen sharp intellect to painstakingly gather all the clues. I should have realized your ability for brilliant deduction when you wrote in one post that all the people in AC spend their money on drugs and prostitutes. Pure genius! I think it's time more people hear from the bible of Dave. How about I drive you to AC so you can tell "the people" there to stop spending your tax dollars on drugs and ho's. I think it's high time "those people" heard from someone with a mind like yours. Just a little advice, Dave. 1) You better have a nice pair of sneakers. 2) You better be able to run a 3 minute mile.
Well, Dave old chum, I think it's time you started commenting on some of the other stories. The world shouldn't be deprived of that thoughtful insight only you can provide. I, for one, can't wait. p.s. Hey Sherlock, who is Ric, anyway?

David Vaccaro

11:16 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Roland/Ric,

I don't know what your problem is. If anyone is showing the "man love" you were accusing me of, it's you. You are keeping a count on the number of postings I make. You are creating multiple names to post under to respond to me. I've admitted that you can consider me gay as I'm a very happy person but you want or need more. I don't have any compulsions like you do..."you" are pursuing me. You seem to be possessed with me since you quote my postings. Ric/Roland...I can't quote your posts because I couldn't care less what you think. I'm guessing you are just lonely and I don't mind helping you out once in a while going back and forth on a subject but I'm married. And just so you know, I've posted on a whole host of subjects...you are the one who seems fixated on this Gay thing. I wonder why.

Dave

Patch_comments_icon

Lauren Burgoon

9:33 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

Looks like we've officially reached the end of useful comments on this story. Comments are closing now.

The editor has closed comments for this article.