The price tag for the acquisition and development of the Bancroft property is likely to rise next week after school district officials unveil their plans in a joint meeting with the Haddonfield Board of Commissioners.
"It’s more expensive than what the borough put out because you get a lot more value there with the dollars," Steve Weinstein, the school board president said Friday. "We’ll talk specifics about money on Wednesday night."
The joint meeting will be held at 7 p.m. Wednesday in the auditorium at the , 242 Kings Highway East.
The borough released a cost study for the acquisition last month. The price was $19.52 million, $14.27 of which would be financed through tax dollars. That would mean a typical taxpayer with a home assessed at the borough average of $491,000 would pay an additional $271 a year in taxes for the next 20 years. The typical property tax bill in the borough is $12,000 yearly.
The estimate includes nearly $4 million in state and county grants and $500,000 in money collected from a borough open-space tax toward the $19.52 million cost. Only about $500,000 in grants have been specifically committed to the project to date.
The borough calculations did not include a new library and learning center the school board wants and additional field improvements, such as more fields than were included by the borough and artificial turf coverings for the fields.
School officials also said Friday that Lullworth Hall, a historic home on the 18.7-acre property, could be leased. The borough plan calls for it to be sold. Officials also speculated that up to 20 planned affordable housing units in the borough plans could be relocated to the district's Radnor Avenue fields, which would be sold to help pay for improvements on the Bancroft site adjacent to the high school.
Weinstein said he and other school officials have spoken to library trustees who have been actively pitching plans to replace the nearly 100-year-old building on Haddon Avenue and Tanner Street. But he cautioned that their interest in sharing a joint library with the high school has not yet been determined.
Both the borough and the school plans call for open space adjacent to Cooper River Park at the rear of the property that will include a 1-mile walking trail.
"I think it's up to the community to communicate with the commissioners if there's a consensus forming for it," Weinstein said. "I think a lot of people are going to be excited by it. It doesn't solve everybody's problem. Cost is an important thing.
"It would be nice after all this process if we can all come together around one idea and work together."
The Bancroft redevelopment has been a potentially divisive topic for more than a decade. The debate has been framed by whether to use the property for more open space, a high-school expansion and more athletic fields or for tax-generating businesses or housing. Borough commissioners had favored a plan to build an assisted-living retirement complex on the site, but a public backlash about "high-density" development forced them to scrap the plan and start over last December.
The commissioners are currently considering three development options that include a public purchase, like the school board wants, market-rate townhomes or independent-living homes for senior citizens.
The property has been owned for the last 128 years by an institution established by Margaret Bancroft to rehabilitate people with developmental disabilities. Bancroft today is a national leader in treatments for brain injuries. Officials there need to upgrade facilities and have leaned toward selling its property in Haddonfield and relocating to do it.
Bancroft, a nonprofit, currently pays no municipal taxes.
Bill Reynolds
I see you are on the library board, so you probably already know this. If you read the fine print, you will discover that our collection is outdated and seldom used. I don't see a need to fund a new building to house an outdated, seldom used collection of books. You and the board have an opportunity to make a strong case for the taxpayers to spend miliions on a new library and in the end, the voters will decide if you have. Seems very democratic to me.
Bill Reynolds
I would like to see specific chapter and verse documentation of the "many library studies" that say "the library's current collection is NEVER circulated." I went back and looked at the studies as have several other people who are committed to getting our facts right. We can't find any such comment, even in the "fine print." The most significant fact we can find with respect to circultation is that Haddonfield Public Library's high per capita circulation rate puts us in the upper tier of public libraries nationally. I'd like to see the "facts" that we are apparently missing. Bill Reynolds
If these aren't facts, I don't know what are.
The final sentence in his last post leads me to conclude that he does not know what "facts" are. He has claimed that studies exist to support his assertions that the Haddonfield Public Library contains "an outdated, seldom used collection of books" many of which are "NEVER circulated." When challenged to produce the facts to support his assertion, he waffles. He is making claims that need to be supported by evidence. Apparently, he can't produce the evidence. The issues connected with decisions about what information and cultural resources the Haddonfield community needs and wants are still being defined. The definition process requires informed democratic (and hopefully rational) dialogue. Unproven generalities and vague assertions masquerading as "facts" do not contribute anything to the outcome. Bill Reynolds
The final sentence in his last post leads me to conclude that he does not know what "facts" are. He has claimed that studies exist to support his assertions that the Haddonfield Public Library contains "an outdated, seldom used collection of books" many of which are "NEVER circulated." When challenged to produce the facts to support his assertion, he waffles. He is making claims that need to be supported by evidence. Apparently, he can't produce the evidence. The issues connected with decisions about what information and cultural resources the Haddonfield community needs and wants are still being defined. The definition process requires informed democratic (and hopefully rational) dialogue. Unproven generalities and vague assertions masquerading as "facts" do not contribute anything to the outcome. Bill Reynolds
It's interesting to note that in their June meeting, the Library Board authorized you to spend up to $25,000 of Library funds to "secure any necessary properties" for a new Library. I guess the decision has already been made, and funds allocated? I don't understand how $25k could be released that easily when a townwide referendum has not been held, and the commissioners have not had their say? This says a lot about your perspective on the issue I suppose. These minutes can be found at http://www.haddonfieldlibrary.org/pdf/libraryboardminutes/libraryboardminutesjune11.pdf
The $25,000 you referenced was not Boro funds and they were not expended after all. They were donated funds. Herb